How does Zero keep the scoring honest?
Zero scoring is calibrated against real internal evaluation frameworks. Reviewers are verified top-1% professionals. Data is anonymized for public use. Every receipt is traceable to a verified reviewer.
- Reviewers are verified top-1% professionals.
- Rubrics come from real company evaluation frameworks.
- Data is anonymized for public materials.
- Every review is traceable and auditable.
Who evaluates the work?
Reviewers must demonstrate senior-level output in the same domain as the task. We verify their role history, their public output, or their verified industry ranking. A random sample of reviews is audited weekly. Reviewers who drift from the rubric are recalibrated or removed.
How is data handled?
Submissions are stored encrypted. Recruiters see only the receipt summary, not raw data. For public case studies, students are anonymized and universities are referenced only after written clearance. Aggregated stats use ranges until exact counts are approved.
What happens if a score seems wrong?
Every receipt includes a dispute link. A second reviewer re-evaluates the submission within 5 business days. The outcome is binding and logged. If a pattern of bad scores emerges for a particular reviewer, we audit their entire history.